http://www.linkedin.com/groups/My-Cool-Inventions-4410201
Look at who has the most post besides John Cremeans, its his good buddy Mark Reyland. John Cremeans and Akos Jankura not only associate with Mark Reyland they sponcor him and promote the United Inventors Association, knowing all the allegation's against them. So is My Cool Inventions really looking out for inventors by sponsoring such a conman and unethical, borderline criminal non profit.
You decide, Bird's of a Feather Flock Together, the UIA promotes My Cool Inventions and they promote the UIA and conman Mark Reyland in return.
Here is the proof !
Our Sponsors
-
The United Inventors Association
Information and support -
My Cool Invention Radio
A chance to get your invention on the radio -
QVC Sprouts
QVC fast track just for Inventors
John
Download the Perfect Pitch Mobile App from Count Me In for Women's... inventorslaunchpad.com
And of course we cant for get the top conman Mark Reyland. Just the newest theft of his, ( copyright theft ) along with his last I.P theft of 2 female inventors which we have all known about.
From: xxxxxxxxxx>
To: 'xxxxxx>
Cc: 'xxxxxxxxx
To: 'xxxxxx>
Cc: 'xxxxxxxxx
>
Sent: Monday, August 12, 2013 12:48 PM
Subject: RE: Article written for the UIA
>
Sent: Monday, August 12, 2013 12:48 PM
Subject: RE: Article written for the UIA
Sent: Monday, August 12, 2013 12:48 PM
Subject: RE: Article written for the UIA
Dear xxxx,
Thanks for your e-mail. First of all, please note my correct e-mail address: xxxxxxx. I am so very glad you brought this “plagiarism” to my attention. This article was “stolen” from a earlier article I wrote for Inventors Digest sometime in 2009. In 2010, I was an Officer on the Board of Directors of the UIA, and I gave Mark Reyland permission to use the article, VERBATIM, from Inventors Digest, and that he must indicate “reprinted with permission from Inventors Digest” (where I continue to be a Contributing Editor to this day). He did not.
Now, 2-3 years later, Mark Reyland (with whom I have no ties, no contact) took portions of my article and rearranged it based on his (lack of) knowledge of my industry. The UIA has become just a farce and money maker. (Please go to: xxxxxxxxxxxxx for my further opinion (printed by Inventors Digest in January 2013). What you read today, is simply NOT my material. (He also spelled my name incorrectly – it is not “xxxxx”).
Please therefore allow me to clarify whatever information you might be seeking about my services. I am attaching an article which completely sums up what should be done concerning working with China factories. Please do not pay any attention to the UIA’s article today.
I would appreciate your response and would also appreciate your confirmation in hopes that this has favorably clarified the situation. Thank you for bringing this unfortunate situation to my attention.
Sent: Monday, August 12, 2013 1:07 PM
Subject: RE: Article written for the UIA
Sent: Monday, August 12, 2013 1:07 PM
Subject: RE: Article written for the UIA
Subject: RE: Article written for the UIA
From: xxxxxxxx>
To: 'xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Monday, August 12, 2013 5:14 PM
Subject: RE: Article written for the UIA
From: xxxxxxxx>
To: 'xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Monday, August 12, 2013 5:14 PM
Subject: RE: Article written for the UIA
To: 'xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Monday, August 12, 2013 5:14 PM
Subject: RE: Article written for the UIA
Most of my material is copyrighted. Way back in 2010 (or 2011), I did give Mark Reyland permission to use my article EXACTLY as it was published by Inventors Digest in 2009. He used SOME of my material and incorporated some of his own editing into my article back then. I explained to him (again, this was 2-3 years ago when I was participating with the UIA – I am no longer participating with the UIA, as you can determine from the article I sent you) back in 2010 or 2011 that I was not happy with the editing job he did to my article, but he left it in the blog back then, and I think that because I was (again, WAS) a board member, I just let it go with a warning. This morning, he apparently was lacking material to put in the blog, so he decided on his own to use my article again and I thank you for bringing this to my attention, because I ordered Warren Tuttle and Mark Reyland to remove it from the blog. I has been removed.
Most of my material is copyrighted. Way back in 2010 (or 2011), I did give Mark Reyland permission to use my article EXACTLY as it was published by Inventors Digest in 2009. He used SOME of my material and incorporated some of his own editing into my article back then. I explained to him (again, this was 2-3 years ago when I was participating with the UIA – I am no longer participating with the UIA, as you can determine from the article I sent you) back in 2010 or 2011 that I was not happy with the editing job he did to my article, but he left it in the blog back then, and I think that because I was (again, WAS) a board member, I just let it go with a warning. This morning, he apparently was lacking material to put in the blog, so he decided on his own to use my article again and I thank you for bringing this to my attention, because I ordered Warren Tuttle and Mark Reyland to remove it from the blog. I has been removed.